12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Michelin ALPIN 6 /63%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%

Dimensions	R13 - R19	R15 - R20	R14 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 76

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 31x

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

Best position in test

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

Worst position in test

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 13.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.35

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 2024

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

Best rating in test

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

91%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

80%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 92%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 77%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 78%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 92%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 85%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 97%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 78%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 68%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 82%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 82%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 B

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

86%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

81%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

71%

Snow handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 77%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 62%

Snow traction

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 68%

Snow braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 87%

3. Michelin ALPIN 6 82%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 74%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 66%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Michelin
ALPIN 6

80%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

71%

Mileage

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 98%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 74%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 67%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

3. Michelin ALPIN 6 73%

Price/value

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 74%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 70%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Michelin
ALPIN 6

87%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 81%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 72%

Comfort

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

83%

Michelin
ALPIN 6

82%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

79%

Dry braking

1. Michelin ALPIN 6 83%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 92%

2. Michelin ALPIN 6 82%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 82%

Ice

(Overall rating)

Michelin
ALPIN 6

85.7%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80.7%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75.2%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	3+	2	2+
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2-	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2	1	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36,1	28,6
Michelin Alpin 6	34,9	29,1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good	2	2-	2+
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good	2	2-	2+	2-
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Uniroyal MS plus 77	32,8	24,6
Michelin Alpin 6	30,4	24,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	29,2	24,6
Show test details

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands