Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 (2026)

Upper-middle

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

8.7

R14 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

WinterContact TS 870 P

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Uniroyal) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Uniroyal is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Uniroyal (75%). The first tyre test of Uniroyal MS plus 77 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the MS plus 77 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

Test Profile

MS plus 77

Blizzak LM-005

Number of tests

19

49

Best position

#3

#1

Average position

11.2

3.2

Latest test

2021

2024

Available sizes

75

244

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Dry

Confidence

Uniroyal MS plus 77

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Dry braking

Uniroyal MS plus 77

93%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Dry handling

Uniroyal MS plus 77

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Wet

Confidence

Uniroyal MS plus 77

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Aquaplaning - cross

Uniroyal MS plus 77

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

97%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Uniroyal MS plus 77

95%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Wet braking

Uniroyal MS plus 77

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Wet circle cornering

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Wet handling

Uniroyal MS plus 77

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Snow

Confidence

Uniroyal MS plus 77

99%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Snow braking

Uniroyal MS plus 77

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Snow cornering

Uniroyal MS plus 77

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Snow handling

Uniroyal MS plus 77

99%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Snow traction

Uniroyal MS plus 77

95%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Ice

Confidence

Uniroyal MS plus 77

94%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Ice braking

Uniroyal MS plus 77

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Ice lateral guidance

Uniroyal MS plus 77

97%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Comfort

Confidence

Uniroyal MS plus 77

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Comfort

Uniroyal MS plus 77

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Exterior noise

Uniroyal MS plus 77

93%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Interior noise

Uniroyal MS plus 77

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

94%

Costs

Confidence

Uniroyal MS plus 77

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Fuel efficiency

Uniroyal MS plus 77

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Mileage

Uniroyal MS plus 77

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Price/value

Uniroyal MS plus 77

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Rolling resistance

Uniroyal MS plus 77

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
Autobild	Winter	2021	205/55 R16	View
Autobild	Winter	2021	205/55 R16	View
Autobild	Winter	2020	225/55 R17	View
Autobild	Winter	2020	245/45 R18	View
Autobild	Winter	2020	245/45 R18	View
Autobild	Winter	2019	225/45 R17	View
Autobild	Winter	2019	225/45 R17	View