Segment
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle
Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| # | Uniroyal MS plus 77
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R17 - R22 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | ||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 | 32,3 | 25 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 30,3 | 24,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
