12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Firestone Winterhawk 3 /0%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	Dunlop Winter Sport 5 /86%

Dimensions	R13 - R19	R13 - R18	R15 - R18	R14 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 189

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 66

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

Number of tests

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 48x

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 14x

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 1.

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 3.

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 16.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 32.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 4.9

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 16

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 2025

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 2020

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

Best rating in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

83%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

82%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

70%

Wet braking

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 86%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 84%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 73%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 88%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 81%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 65%

Wet circle cornering

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 87%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 68%

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 63%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 85%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 76%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 77%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 65%

Wet handling

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 87%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 80%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 71%

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 55%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 B

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 C

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

84%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

81%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

80%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

Snow braking

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 84%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 84%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 78%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 78%

Snow handling

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 86%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 82%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 76%

Snow traction

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 88%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 80%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 75%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

86%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

81%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

78%

Mileage

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 83%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 78%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 70%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 69%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 C

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 E

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

82%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

75%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75%

Exterior noise

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 83%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 81%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 81%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 78%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 72 dB

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 ?

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

82%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

75%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Dry braking

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 77%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 77%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 74%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 71%

Ice

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

89%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

84%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

77%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 11 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
Uniroyal MS plus 77	34,2	25
Firestone Winterhawk 3	37,9
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	35,2	25
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Uniroyal MS plus 77	32,8	24,6
Firestone Winterhawk 3	34,3	25,5
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	34,8	-
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	32,9	24,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3	2	2
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Conditionally recommended	3	3+	2+	2+
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2-	2-
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36,1	27,9
Firestone Winterhawk 3	38,2	27,8
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	36,6	28,6
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	34,8	28,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2+
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	2	2-
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Firestone Winterhawk 3	36,3	27,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	38,4	-
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	33,6	27,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Uniroyal MS plus 77	39,1	25,7
Firestone Winterhawk 3	39,8	27,5
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	40,6	26,4
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	36,1	25,5
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,3	2,1	1,7	2,0	2,8	1,5	1,5
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2,3	3,2	2,5	2,6	3,1	2,5	1,9
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	3,0	2,9	2,4	2,0	2,8	2,0	2,2
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: -	3,7	2,6	2,2	2,5	3,2	2,0	1,9
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: -	2,4	2,4	1,9	2,2	2,8	2,0	1,6
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,2	2,8	1	1,5
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2,7	3,3	1,7	2,9	3,7	2,5	2,0
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	4,6	2,3	2,8	2,6	3,0	2,0	1,8
Show test details