18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Firestone Winterhawk 3 /0%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%	Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 /0%

Dimensions	R13 - R19	R13 - R18	R15 - R18	R14 - R21	R13 - R17	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Premium

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 66

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 21x

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 14x

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2.

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 3.

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 20.

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 32.

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 7.1

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 16

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 2020

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2020

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

5. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory

6. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

91%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

85%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

70%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 89%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 81%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

5. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 71%

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 65%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 89%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 68%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 67%

6. Firestone Winterhawk 3 63%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 94%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 92%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 85%

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 81%

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 76%

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 65%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 92%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 87%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 87%

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 71%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 69%

6. Firestone Winterhawk 3 55%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 95%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 95%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 84%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 73%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 63%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 C

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 C

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

89%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

86%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

81%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

80%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Snow braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 92%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 87%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 84%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 78%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 78%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Snow handling

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 82%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 76%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Snow traction

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 89%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 80%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 80%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 860 79%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 75%

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 0%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

87%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

81%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

80%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Mileage

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 79%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 78%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 76%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 70%

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 69%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 E

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 E

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

93%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

80%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

75%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

56%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 83%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 81%

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 79%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 79%

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 78%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 ?

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

5. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 ?

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

87%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

81%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

75%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

72%

Dry braking

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 81%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 81%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 77%

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 74%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 72%

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 71%

Ice

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

89%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

79%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.5%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

77%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 11 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
Uniroyal MS plus 77	34,2	25
Firestone Winterhawk 3	37,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Uniroyal MS plus 77	32,8	24,6
Firestone Winterhawk 3	34,3	25,5
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	34,8	-
Continental WinterContact TS 860	31,5	24,5
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	32	24,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3	2	2
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Conditionally recommended	3	3+	2+	2+
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2-	2-
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Good*	2	2	1-	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36,1	27,9
Firestone Winterhawk 3	38,2	27,8
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	36,6	28,6
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,5	27,6
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	34,9	27,7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2+
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	2	2-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	1-	2-	2	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	2+	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Firestone Winterhawk 3	36,3	27,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	38,4	-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Continental WinterContact TS 860	33,5	27,5
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	35,9	28,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Uniroyal MS plus 77	39,1	25,7
Firestone Winterhawk 3	39,8	27,5
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	40,6	26,4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,2	25,6
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	39,1	26,2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,3	2,1	1,7	2,0	2,8	1,5	1,5
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2,3	3,2	2,5	2,6	3,1	2,5	1,9
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	3,0	2,9	2,4	2,0	2,8	2,0	2,2
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: -	3,7	2,6	2,2	2,5	3,2	2,0	1,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,5	2,1	3,3	2,4	3,7	2,0	2,1
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,2	2,8	1	1,5
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2,7	3,3	1,7	2,9	3,7	2,5	2,0
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	4,6	2,3	2,8	2,6	3,0	2,0	1,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,8	2,6	1,9	2,9	3,6	2,5	2,0
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: -	2,8	1,9	2,6	2,8	4,0	2,5	2,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1	2+	1	1
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2-	3+	1-	2-
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	2-	2	2	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2-	2-	2+	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	36,8	27,7
Uniroyal MS plus 77	41,7	28,6
Firestone Winterhawk 3	41,9	28,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	43,1	28,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	43,4	28,1
Show test details

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands