18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 /100%

Dimensions	R13 - R19	R14 - R22	R16 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Premium

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 133

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 21x

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 1.

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

Worst position in test

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 4.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

Average position in tests

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 1.67

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

Year of the last test

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 2025

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

Best rating in test

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Exemplary

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Good

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

88%

Michelin
PILOT ALPIN 5

82%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

73%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 79%

3. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 75%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 91%

2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 82%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

3. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 67%

Wet handling

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 96%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 74%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 96%

2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 88%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 66%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 B

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

87%

Michelin
PILOT ALPIN 5

86%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Snow braking

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 95%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 83%

Snow handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 75%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 69%

Snow traction

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 82%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 73%

Snow cornering

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 71%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Michelin
PILOT ALPIN 5

77%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

72%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

72%

Mileage

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 100%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 68%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 65%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

3. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 75%

Price/value

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 70%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 63%

3. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 55%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 C

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

81%

Michelin
PILOT ALPIN 5

81%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76%

Exterior noise

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 77%

3. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 71%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

3. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Michelin
PILOT ALPIN 5

91%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

81%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Dry braking

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 74%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 72%

Dry handling

1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76%

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80.7%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75.2%

Michelin
PILOT ALPIN 5

64.5%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	3+	2	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2	1	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36,1	28,6
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good	2	2-	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good	2-	2	2+	3+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	1-	2
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 Rating: Exemplary	2+	1-	2+	1-
Show test details