18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%	Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 /0%

Dimensions	R13 - R19	R14 - R21	R13 - R17	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Premium

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 21x

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2.

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 20.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 7.1

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2020

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

91.6%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

85.2%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 C

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

90.1%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

90.5%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.4%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

68.9%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 E

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.2%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

77.1%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

69%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

56%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 ?

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

84.2%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

83.7%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74.4%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

72%

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

79%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.5%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

77%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 8 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	1-	2-	2	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	2+	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Continental WinterContact TS 860	33,5	27,5
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	35,9	28,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2-	3	1-	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	1-
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: -	1-	2	2+	1
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: -	2-	2	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Uniroyal MS plus 77	39,1	25,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,2	25,6
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	39,1	26,2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,3	2,1	1,7	2,0	2,8	1,5	1,5
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2,3	3,2	2,5	2,6	3,1	2,5	1,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,5	2,1	3,3	2,4	3,7	2,0	2,1
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,2	2,8	1	1,5
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2,7	3,3	1,7	2,9	3,7	2,5	2,0
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,8	2,6	1,9	2,9	3,6	2,5	2,0
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: -	2,8	1,9	2,6	2,8	4,0	2,5	2,3
Show test details