18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Barum Polaris 5 /63%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%

Dimensions	R13 - R19	R13 - R19	R14 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

3. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

3. Barum Polaris 5 76

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

3. Barum Polaris 5 13x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

3. Barum Polaris 5 9.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

3. Barum Polaris 5 26.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

3. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

2. Barum Polaris 5 2023

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

2. Barum Polaris 5 Good

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

3. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

87%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

69%

Barum
Polaris 5

64%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

2. Barum Polaris 5 69%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 65%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 73%

3. Barum Polaris 5 61%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 72%

3. Barum Polaris 5 68%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 96%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 59%

3. Barum Polaris 5 55%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76%

3. Barum Polaris 5 66%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Barum Polaris 5 C

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

91%

Barum
Polaris 5

74%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

69%

Snow handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 94%

2. Barum Polaris 5 78%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 63%

Snow traction

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 69%

3. Barum Polaris 5 68%

Snow braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 79%

3. Barum Polaris 5 79%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 96%

2. Barum Polaris 5 70%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 67%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 5

78%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

71%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

68%

Mileage

1. Barum Polaris 5 68%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 64%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 63%

Rolling resistance

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 79%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

3. Barum Polaris 5 75%

Price/value

1. Barum Polaris 5 90%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 69%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 61%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

2. Barum Polaris 5 E

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

73%

Barum
Polaris 5

68%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Barum Polaris 5 75%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 71%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 76%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76%

3. Barum Polaris 5 61%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

3. Barum Polaris 5 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

77%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

70%

Barum
Polaris 5

66%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 68%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 68%

3. Barum Polaris 5 60%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Barum Polaris 5 72%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 72%

Ice

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80.7%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75.2%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	3+	2	2+
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2+	1-	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2	1	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36,1	28,6
Barum Polaris 5	36,1	28,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good	2-	2	2+	3+
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Good	2-	2	2	2-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	1-	2
Show test details