18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Barum Polaris 3 /0%	Firestone Winterhawk 3 /0%	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 /0%

Dimensions	R13 - R19	R13 - R18	R13 - R18	R16 - R19	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Premium

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

5. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 66

4. Barum Polaris 3 66

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 21x

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 14x

4. Barum Polaris 3 10x

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

Best position in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2.

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 3.

3. Barum Polaris 3 3.

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

Worst position in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 16.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 20.

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 32.

Average position in tests

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 7.1

2. Barum Polaris 3 10.6

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 16

Year of the last test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 2020

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2020

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

5. Barum Polaris 3 2018

Best rating in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

86%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

85%

Barum
Polaris 3

74%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

70%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

68.9%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 C

2. Barum Polaris 3 C

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 C

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

89%

Barum
Polaris 3

88%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

85%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

85%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

74%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

87%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

83%

Barum
Polaris 3

78%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

78%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

71.8%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 E

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 E

3. Barum Polaris 3 F

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

83%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

80%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

78%

Barum
Polaris 3

75%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

59.4%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 ?

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 ?

4. Barum Polaris 3 ?

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905

91.1%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

87%

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

76%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Ice

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

82.7%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

79%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75.2%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

74.8%

Barum
Polaris 3

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 9 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3	2	2
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2+	2-
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Conditionally recommended	3	3+	2+	2+
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Good*	2	2	1-	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36,1	27,9
Barum Polaris 3	36,7	27,8
Firestone Winterhawk 3	38,2	27,8
Yokohama W.drive V905	36,6	29,5
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	34,9	27,7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2+
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	1-	2+
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	2	2-
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Barum Polaris 3	35,8	27,6
Firestone Winterhawk 3	36,3	27,9
Yokohama W.drive V905	34,7	28,3
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	35,9	28,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2-	3	1-	2+
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	2+
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: -	2-	2	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Uniroyal MS plus 77	39,1	25,7
Barum Polaris 3	37,2	26,1
Firestone Winterhawk 3	39,8	27,5
Yokohama W.drive V905	39,9	26,9
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	39,1	26,2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,2	2,8	1	1,5
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2,7	3,3	1,7	2,9	3,7	2,5	2,0
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: -	3,4	2,2	2,1	2,8	3,6	1,5	2,0
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	4,6	2,3	2,8	2,6	3,0	2,0	1,8
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: -	2,8	1,9	2,6	2,8	4,0	2,5	2,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1	2+	1	1
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2-	3+	1-	2-
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Exemplary	2-	2	2+	2-
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	2-	2	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	36,8	27,7
Uniroyal MS plus 77	41,7	28,6
Barum Polaris 3	40,8	28,6
Firestone Winterhawk 3	41,9	28,9
Yokohama W.drive V905	42,6	29,4
Show test details

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands