Segment
1. Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 Upper-middle2. Firestone Multiseason 2 Upper-middle3. Viking Fourtech Lowcost
Comparison: Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Viking Fourtech
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 Satisfactory3. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory3. Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 5.4 | 1.8 | 2.3 | ||||
| UNIROYAL AllSeasonExpert 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 4 | 2.2 | 4 | ||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3.6 | 3.1 | 3.6 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 | |||||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 | 44,8 | 52,7 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 42,4 | 54,1 | |||||
| Viking Fourtech | 43,5 | 52,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 | 47,7 | 47,9 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 41,2 | 49,3 | |||||
| Viking Fourtech | 45,3 | 51 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
