Segment
1. Tristar Ice-Plus S210 Lowcost2. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Tristar Ice-Plus S210 vs. Barum Polaris 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tristar) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Tristar (0%). But when it comes to comparing Tristar Ice-Plus S210 and Barum Polaris 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Tristar Ice-Plus S210 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Barum Polaris 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Ice-Plus S210 and the Polaris 3 were tested.
| # | Tristar Ice-Plus S210
| Barum Polaris 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Barum Polaris 3 10.6
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Tristar Ice-Plus S210 | 47,3 | - | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 37,2 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
