Segment
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle4. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost5. Riken Road Performance Lowcost
Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Nexen N blue HD Plus vs. Riken Road Performance vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.584. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended3. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory4. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 | 37,8 | 40,5 | |||||
| Nexen N blue HD plus | 38,3 | 40,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
