Segment
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle4. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost5. Riken Road Performance Lowcost6. Avon ZV7 Lowcost7. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost
Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Nexen N blue HD Plus vs. Riken Road Performance vs. Avon ZV7 vs. Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3
Number of sizes available
2. Avon ZV7 278
Number of tests
Best position in test
6. Avon ZV7 8.
Worst position in test
6. Avon ZV7 42.
Average position in tests
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.584. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.55. Avon ZV7 18.556. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended4. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory5. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory6. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory3. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended5. Avon ZV7 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
2. Avon ZV7 74%
Wet circle cornering
2. Avon ZV7 74%
Aquaplaning - cross
7. Avon ZV7 60%
Wet handling
1. Avon ZV7 85%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
3. Avon ZV7 79%
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Avon ZV7 82%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
6. Avon ZV7 55%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 | 37,8 | 40,5 | |||||
| Nexen N blue HD plus | 38,3 | 40,6 | |||||
| Avon ZV7 | 38,3 | 38,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
