Segment
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle4. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost5. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost
Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Nexen N blue HD Plus vs. Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.584. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.55. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended4. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory5. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory3. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 | 37,8 | 40,5 | |||||
| Nexen N blue HD plus | 38,3 | 40,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
