Segment
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle3. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Lowcost4. Avon ZV7 Lowcost
Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Maxxis Mecotra 3 vs. Avon ZV7 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| # | Toyo Proxes CF2
| Maxxis Mecotra 3
| Avon ZV7
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R13 - R20 | R13 - R21 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
1. Avon ZV7 278
Number of tests
Best position in test
4. Avon ZV7 8.
Worst position in test
4. Avon ZV7 42.
Average position in tests
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.583. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.54. Avon ZV7 18.55
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended2. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Satisfactory3. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory4. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Satisfactory2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended4. Avon ZV7 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
1. Avon ZV7 74%
Aquaplaning - cross
3. Avon ZV7 60%
Wet handling
1. Avon ZV7 85%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Avon ZV7 79%
Wet braking
3. Avon ZV7 74%
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Avon ZV7 82%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
4. Avon ZV7 55%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Maxxis Mecotra 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 1,9 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
