Segment
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle3. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Lowcost4. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost
| # | Toyo Proxes CF2
| Maxxis Mecotra 3
| Apollo Alnac 4G
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R13 - R20 | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle3. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Lowcost4. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.583. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.54. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended3. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Satisfactory4. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
1. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Satisfactory2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory3. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Maxxis Mecotra 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 1,9 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||