Segment
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.583. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended3. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
