Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.583. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended3. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 29,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,8 | 27,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
