Segment
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle3. Avon ZV7 Lowcost4. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost
Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Avon ZV7 vs. Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| # | Toyo Proxes CF2
| Avon ZV7
| Apollo Alnac 4G
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R13 - R21 | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
1. Avon ZV7 278
Number of tests
Best position in test
4. Avon ZV7 8.
Worst position in test
4. Avon ZV7 42.
Average position in tests
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.582. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.53. Avon ZV7 18.554. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended3. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory4. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory2. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended4. Avon ZV7 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
4. Avon ZV7 60%
Wet handling
1. Avon ZV7 85%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Avon ZV7 79%
Wet braking
2. Avon ZV7 74%
Wet circle cornering
2. Avon ZV7 74%
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Avon ZV7 82%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
4. Avon ZV7 55%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 | 37,8 | 40,5 | |||||
| Avon ZV7 | 38,3 | 38,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
