Segment
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Upper-middle3. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV vs. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Nokian Line SUV
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary2. Nokian Line SUV Good3. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian Line SUV Good3. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 153 | 42 | 37 | 14 | 6 | ||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Rating: Conditionally recommended | 127 | 42 | 44 | 17 | 9 | ||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Highly recommended | 153 | 68 | 50 | 16 | 6 | ||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Recommended | 141 | 61 | 44 | 14 | 7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,6 | 9,7 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 7,0 | 7,9 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 9,6 | 9,2 | 7 | 6 | |||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good | 9,0 | 7,9 | 7 | 8 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
