Segment
4. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Upper-middle5. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV vs. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 vs. Nokian Line SUV vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Very good4. Nokian Line SUV Good5. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian Line SUV Good4. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Recommended5. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 153 | 42 | 37 | 14 | 6 | ||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Rating: Conditionally recommended | 127 | 42 | 44 | 17 | 9 | ||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Highly recommended | 153 | 68 | 50 | 16 | 6 | ||
| Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Rating: Recommended | 148 | 62 | 50 | 16 | 7 | ||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Recommended | 141 | 61 | 44 | 14 | 7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,6 | 9,7 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 7,0 | 7,9 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 9,6 | 9,2 | 7 | 6 | |||
| Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Rating: Very good | 9,0 | 9,7 | 8 | 8 | |||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good | 9,0 | 7,9 | 7 | 8 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
