18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Toyo Celsius AS2 /52%	Vredestein Quatrac /92%	Kleber Quadraxer 3 /79%	Laufenn G Fit 4S /64%	Firestone Multiseason 2 /55%	Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO /0%

Dimensions	R15 - R20	R15 - R20	R14 - R20	R13 - R17	R13 - R19	R15 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Quick summary: The Vredestein Quatrac is the clear test winner in independent comparisons — it scores 93% in our database and consistently places in the top third of Autobild and ADAC line-ups. The Toyo Celsius AS2 scores 54%, offering strong mileage and value but lagging behind in wet and dynamic handling. Neither model has been replaced by a newer model in our records.

Links: Vredestein Quatrac — manufacturer: Vredestein. Toyo Celsius AS2 — manufacturer: Toyo.

Aggregated test picture

Autobild (multiple years): Vredestein finished as high as 2nd of 15 and frequently inside the top 5 (5th of 37 in another test). Toyo typically ranks lower (about 12th in comparable Autobild tests).

ADAC: Vredestein placed 6th of 16, Toyo 11th of 16.

Overall rating: Vredestein 93% vs Toyo 54% — a significant gap that matches the pattern seen across wet, dry and mixed-condition testing.

Vredestein Quatrac — strengths & weaknesses

Strengths: Outstanding wet performance (wet handling, wet braking, aquaplaning resistance) and low exterior noise. Tests repeatedly highlight the tyre as a “Nässespezialist” with confident behaviour in rain and mixed conditions. Also scores well for dry handling and agility.

Weaknesses: Average tread life in several tests and in some reports a slightly higher rolling resistance. Some test notes call out “average wet and snow braking” in specific scenarios, but overall the Quatrac’s wet reserves and handling usually compensate.

Verdict: The Quatrac is the better-performing all-round tyre for drivers prioritising safety in wet conditions and dynamic handling. It is the superior choice in head-to-heads against the Toyo on braking and aquaplaning tests.

Toyo Celsius AS2 — strengths & weaknesses

Strengths: Excellent value and long mileage — repeated test summaries praise its high kilometre performance and competitive price/value ratio. Comfortable ride and low exterior noise are other pluses. Good aquaplaning reserves are noted in several reviews, making it a dependable budget option.

Weaknesses: Weaker winter and wet dynamic performance compared with the Quatrac: longer wet braking distances, understeer on wet and snowy surfaces, delayed steering response. These deficits show up in lower positions in Autobild and ADAC tests.

Verdict: The Celsius AS2 is a sensible, cost-conscious choice for mileage-focused drivers who accept compromises in handling precision and wet braking. It is not the top performer in mixed-weather performance tests.

Head-to-head conclusion
Across the comprehensive set of tests (Autobild 2022–2025, ADAC and comparative reviews), the Vredestein Quatrac outperforms the Toyo Celsius AS2 in almost all dynamic and wet-condition metrics, and places consistently higher in overall rankings. The Toyo compensates with better wear and price/value, so choose the Quatrac if wet-weather safety and handling are priorities, or the Celsius AS2 if cost-per-kilometre and comfort dominate your buying decision.

Segment

1. Vredestein Quatrac Premium

2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Premium

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle

4. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle

5. Firestone Multiseason 2 Upper-middle

6. Laufenn G Fit 4S Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 111

2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 90

3. Vredestein Quatrac 85

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 81

5. Firestone Multiseason 2 61

6. Laufenn G Fit 4S 4

Number of tests

1. Vredestein Quatrac 16x

2. Toyo Celsius AS2 14x

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 13x

4. Kleber Quadraxer 3 13x

5. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 11x

6. Laufenn G Fit 4S 5x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 1.

2. Vredestein Quatrac 1.

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 4.

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 6.

5. Toyo Celsius AS2 7.

6. Laufenn G Fit 4S 10.

Worst position in test

1. Vredestein Quatrac 6.

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 9.

3. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 15.

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 16.

5. Laufenn G Fit 4S 21.

6. Firestone Multiseason 2 22.

Average position in tests

1. Vredestein Quatrac 3.13

2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 5.91

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 6.31

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 10.92

5. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.64

6. Laufenn G Fit 4S 14.8

Year of the last test

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 2025

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 2025

3. Laufenn G Fit 4S 2025

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 2025

5. Vredestein Quatrac 2025

6. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 2022

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Exemplary

2. Vredestein Quatrac Exemplary

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 Good

5. Laufenn G Fit 4S Good

6. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 Good

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Good

3. Laufenn G Fit 4S Good

4. Vredestein Quatrac Recommended

5. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended

6. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Quatrac

86%

Laufenn
G Fit 4S

82%

Bridgestone
Weather Control A005 EVO

79%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

73%

Firestone
Multiseason 2

66%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

65%

Wet handling

1. Vredestein Quatrac 91%

2. Laufenn G Fit 4S 88%

3. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 75%

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 72%

5. Kleber Quadraxer 3 60%

6. Toyo Celsius AS2 58%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 84%

2. Vredestein Quatrac 81%

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 74%

4. Laufenn G Fit 4S 69%

5. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 60%

6. Firestone Multiseason 2 58%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 96%

2. Laufenn G Fit 4S 84%

3. Vredestein Quatrac 84%

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 74%

5. Kleber Quadraxer 3 68%

6. Toyo Celsius AS2 50%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 83%

2. Vredestein Quatrac 82%

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 80%

4. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 78%

5. Laufenn G Fit 4S 77%

6. Firestone Multiseason 2 55%

Wet circle cornering

1. Laufenn G Fit 4S 92%

2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 88%

3. Vredestein Quatrac 87%

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 72%

5. Kleber Quadraxer 3 68%

6. Toyo Celsius AS2 60%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO A

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 B

3. Laufenn G Fit 4S C

4. Vredestein Quatrac ?

5. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

6. Toyo Celsius AS2 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

84%

Vredestein
Quatrac

75%

Firestone
Multiseason 2

71%

Laufenn
G Fit 4S

70%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

62%

Bridgestone
Weather Control A005 EVO

44%

Snow traction

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 85%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 77%

3. Laufenn G Fit 4S 75%

4. Vredestein Quatrac 74%

5. Toyo Celsius AS2 56%

6. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 51%

Snow handling

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 83%

2. Vredestein Quatrac 73%

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 72%

4. Laufenn G Fit 4S 57%

5. Toyo Celsius AS2 56%

6. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 32%

Snow braking

1. Laufenn G Fit 4S 84%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 83%

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 81%

4. Vredestein Quatrac 81%

5. Toyo Celsius AS2 72%

6. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 56%

Snow cornering

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 84%

2. Vredestein Quatrac 70%

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 66%

4. Laufenn G Fit 4S 61%

5. Firestone Multiseason 2 56%

6. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 35%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Weather Control A005 EVO

82%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

76%

Vredestein
Quatrac

76%

Laufenn
G Fit 4S

71%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

67%

Firestone
Multiseason 2

59%

Dry braking

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 86%

2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 84%

3. Vredestein Quatrac 75%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 71%

5. Laufenn G Fit 4S 56%

6. Firestone Multiseason 2 55%

Dry handling

1. Laufenn G Fit 4S 88%

2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 79%

3. Vredestein Quatrac 76%

4. Kleber Quadraxer 3 72%

5. Firestone Multiseason 2 64%

6. Toyo Celsius AS2 62%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Quatrac

79%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

78%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

76%

Bridgestone
Weather Control A005 EVO

70%

Firestone
Multiseason 2

63%

Laufenn
G Fit 4S

60%

Exterior noise

1. Vredestein Quatrac 83%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 79%

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 74%

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 72%

5. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 66%

6. Laufenn G Fit 4S 51%

Comfort

1. Toyo Celsius AS2 80%

2. Vredestein Quatrac 76%

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 76%

4. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 73%

5. Laufenn G Fit 4S 69%

6. Firestone Multiseason 2 56%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 71 dB

2. Toyo Celsius AS2 ?

3. Vredestein Quatrac ?

4. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

5. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO ?

6. Laufenn G Fit 4S ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Toyo
Celsius AS2

82%

Laufenn
G Fit 4S

72%

Firestone
Multiseason 2

69%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

67%

Vredestein
Quatrac

62%

Bridgestone
Weather Control A005 EVO

54%

Rolling resistance

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 92%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 80%

3. Vredestein Quatrac 69%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 67%

5. Laufenn G Fit 4S 59%

6. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 0%

Price/value

1. Laufenn G Fit 4S 92%

2. Toyo Celsius AS2 91%

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 67%

4. Vredestein Quatrac 67%

5. Firestone Multiseason 2 56%

6. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 54%

Mileage

1. Toyo Celsius AS2 84%

2. Laufenn G Fit 4S 67%

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 62%

4. Vredestein Quatrac 62%

5. Firestone Multiseason 2 60%

6. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 53%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 C

2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO C

3. Laufenn G Fit 4S D

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 ?

5. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

6. Vredestein Quatrac ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 10 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Winter	Wet	Dry	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	1–
Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2-	1–
Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	3+
Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good	2+	2	2-	2–
Laufenn G Fit 4S Rating: Good	2	2+	2-	2
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	38.0	43.9
Toyo Celsius AS2	40.4	51.0
Vredestein Quatrac	40.3	43.9
Kleber Quadraxer 3	39.3	47.9
Laufenn G Fit 4S	42.1	45.8
Firestone Multiseason 2	41.5	50.3
Show test details

AUTOBILD Allyear tyre test 2024 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Conditionally recommended	3	3	3+	4
Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2	2+
Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good	2	2-	2+	3+
Show test details

AUTOBILD Allyear tyre test 2024 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	36.8	50.5
Toyo Celsius AS2	39.9	59.0
Vredestein Quatrac	40.2	55.4
Kleber Quadraxer 3	38.5	58.4
Laufenn G Fit 4S	42.7	58.2
Firestone Multiseason 2	41.8	64.0
Show test details

ADAC Allyear tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	5.4	1.8	2.3
Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory	3.8	2.3	3.8
Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Good	2.8	2.2	3.1
Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Satisfactory	3.6	3.1	3.6
Show test details

Tyre Reviews Allyear tyre test 2023 195/65 R15

Name
Toyo Celsius AS2
Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Recommended
Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Highly recommended
Firestone Multiseason 2
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2023 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	37.7	45
Toyo Celsius AS2	40.9	50.6
Vredestein Quatrac	40.3	45.4
Kleber Quadraxer 3	38.3	48.5
Firestone Multiseason 2	41.8	47.9
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2023 225/45 R17

Name
Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory
Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary
Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good
Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Satisfactory
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2022 195/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	39,9	44,4
Toyo Celsius AS2	43,5	53,2
Vredestein Quatrac	41,7	47,1
Kleber Quadraxer 3	40,3	49,4
Laufenn G Fit 4S	45,2	53,9
Firestone Multiseason 2	45,9	48,9
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO	41,4	44,4
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2022 195/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1-	1
Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2	1
Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Satisfactory	2+	2	2+	2-
Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good	2	2+	2+	2-
Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	2	2+
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Conditionally recommended	2+	2	3	2-
Show test details

Comparison: Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands