Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. Star Performer UHP-3 Lowcost
Comparison: Star Performer UHP-3 vs. Falken Azenis FK510
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Star) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Star (15%). But when it comes to comparing Star Performer UHP-3 and Falken Azenis FK510, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Star Performer UHP-3 was done in 2020, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 245/40 R19 test, where both the Performer UHP-3 and the Azenis FK510 were tested.
| # | Star Performer UHP-3
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Dry steering response
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Star Performer UHP-3 Rating: Not recommended | 4- | 3+ | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
