Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. Star Performer UHP-3 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Star) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Star (15%). But when it comes to comparing Star Performer UHP-3 and Falken Azenis FK510, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Star Performer UHP-3 was done in 2020, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 245/40 R19 test, where both the Performer UHP-3 and the Azenis FK510 were tested.
| # | Star Performer UHP-3
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. Star Performer UHP-3 Lowcost
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Star Performer UHP-3 Rating: Not recommended | 4- | 3+ | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||