check Star Performer UHP-3 availability
Table of contents:
Strengths
Excellent resistance to aquaplaning in wet conditions.
Low price makes the tire an affordable choice.
Low rolling resistance helps improve fuel efficiency.
Weaknesses
Long braking distances and insufficient grip on wet roads, making wet performance potentially unsafe.
Delayed steering response and vague handling reduce driving precision.
Performance Analysis: Star Performer UHP-3
This graph shows how the tyre ranks across different properties compared to other tested tyres. Higher percentile means better performance - 100% means better than every tyre in every test, 0% means worse than every tyre in every test.
Loading...
Loading comparison data...
Timeline
2020
Star Performer UHP-3 was launched
2020
Star Performer UHP-3 was tested 1x (Autozeitung)
2022
Star Performer UHP-3 was tested 1x (Autobild)
Sizes
Star Performer UHP-3 is made in 32 sizes, starting from 195/50 R15 up to 315/35 R20.
◀
▶
Filter:
show prices Similar tires
Star
Performer UHP-3
R15 - R20
Price from:
Comparison: tyres similar to Star Performer UHP-3
Star Performer UHP-3 in tyre tests
All tyre tests where Star Performer UHP-3 was featured:All tests
Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 245/40 R19
not recommended
Ranked #10 of 10
The Star Performer UHP-3 finished at the bottom, ranking 10th out of 10 competitors in its evaluation. Despite its advantages such as respectable aquaplaning resistance, low cost, and reduced rolling resistance, the tyre was ultimately given a final rating of 'Not recommended'. Critical feedback noted the tyre's dangerously long braking distances and inadequate grip on wet surfaces, delayed steering response, and vague handling characteristics. These significant drawbacks overshadowed its positive aspects, casting doubts on its overall performance and safety capabilities.
not recommended
Ranked #10 of 10
The Star Performer UHP-3 finished at the bottom, ranking 10th out of 10 competitors in its evaluation. Despite its advantages such as respectable aquaplaning resistance, low cost, and reduced rolling resistance, the tyre was ultimately given a final rating of 'Not recommended'. Critical feedback noted the tyre's dangerously long braking distances and inadequate grip on wet surfaces, delayed steering response, and vague handling characteristics. These significant drawbacks overshadowed its positive aspects, casting doubts on its overall performance and safety capabilities.
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Star Performer UHP-3 | 4- | 3+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Star Performer UHP-3 | 177 | 63 | 114 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
Test ratings distribution
| 0% (1x) |
|---|
| Not recommended |
| 1x |
Ratings x Wheel size
| R19 |
|---|
| 0% (1x) |
Ratings x Width
| 245/xx Rxx |
|---|
| 0% (1x) |
