Segment
2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium3. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Premium5. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle6. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle7. Star Performer SUV-1 Lowcost
Comparison: Star Performer SUV-1 vs. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Crugen HP91 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Satin vs. Nokian Line SUV vs. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Highly recommended3. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Highly recommended4. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Very good5. Nokian Line SUV Good6. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Recommended3. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended4. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory5. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Still recommended6. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Still recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Star Performer SUV-1 Rating: Not recommended | 4+ | 3+ | 2- | ||||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Recommended | 2 | 1- | 2 | ||||
| Kumho Crugen HP91 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Satin Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
