Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. Fulda SportControl 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127

When comparing the Sava Intensa UHP 2 and the Fulda SportControl 2 for summer performance, both tyres score similarly on paper (our site rating: 63% each) but show different strengths in independent tests. Neither model currently lists a direct replacement—these are the latest entries tested here.

Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs Fulda SportControl 2 — quick framing: both are summer tyres aimed at value-conscious drivers who still expect confident wet and dry handling. For manufacturer references see Sava and Fulda.

Test positions and overall comparison

• AutoBild (52 tyres): Fulda placed 9th, Sava 11th — a small edge to Fulda in that large comparative test.


• ACE (9 tyres): Sava finished 2nd, Fulda 3rd — Sava shows a slight advantage in ACE’s objective wet and dry handling checks.


• TyreReviews summary (2021): both tyres praised for wet reserves and short wet/dry braking; both criticized for limited/marginal tread life.

Strengths — Sava Intensa UHP 2

• Excellent wet handling and aquaplaning resistance: ACE highlights very good objective wet handling and cornering; AutoBild also notes aquaplaning performance.


• Strong dry behaviour: stable handling on dry roads and short dry braking distances.


• Value: competitive price/performance ratio makes it an attractive budget sporty option.

Weaknesses — Sava Intensa UHP 2

• Tread life: multiple testers note limited longevity compared with premium rivals.


• Minor compromises on comfort/noise relative to some peers (less highlighted in tests).

Strengths — Fulda SportControl 2

• Comfort and low exterior noise: AutoBild flags quiet running and good ride comfort — a selling point for everyday driving.


• Wet braking and stability: ACE and TyreReviews praise wet braking and handling; strong aquaplaning resistance is also reported.


• Rolling resistance: noted as a positive in AutoBild, which can help fuel economy.

Weaknesses — Fulda SportControl 2

• Delayed steering response: testers reported a slightly hesitant turn-in feel, which can reduce on-centre precision in sporty driving.


• Tread life: similar to Sava, wear is only moderate versus premium competitors.

Verdict — which to choose?
If your priority is the most confident wet handling and sharp objective performance in wet tests, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 edges ahead in ACE’s checks and delivers excellent wet reserves at a lower price. If you prioritize everyday comfort, low exterior noise and slightly better results in a broad AutoBild field, the Fulda SportControl 2 is the marginally better all-rounder. Overall test outcomes are very close — both tyres deliver strong wet performance and economical value, but both sacrifice some longevity compared with premium alternatives.

Choose Sava for sharper wet/dry handling on a budget; choose Fulda for a quieter, more comfortable ride with good wet braking. For full test details, see the tyre pages: Sava Intensa UHP 2 and Fulda SportControl 2, and manufacturer overviews at Sava and Fulda.