Segment
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost2. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. Fulda SportControl 2
Table of contents:
| # | Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Fulda SportControl 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The comparison under consideration is between two well-reputed summer tyres — the
Sava Intensa UHP 2 and the Fulda SportControl 2. The former being a development over the Sava Intensa UHP whereas the latter has no previous models.
Beginning with the Sava Intensa UHP 2, our rating for this tyre stands at 67%. In terms of its performance, it secured an impressive 2nd position in the ACE test out of 9 tyres. Key strengths of the tyre can be derived as dry handling, exterior noise, wet circle cornering, and wet handling. Some features it excelled in the Autobild test include resistance to aquaplaning and great value for its price, where its position remained 11th out of 52 tyres. However, it should be noted that the tyre's lifespan was found to be slightly limited.
On the other hand, we have the Fulda SportControl 2, scoring a higher rating of 74% in our books. In mutual tests, this one came out close to the Sava Intensa UHP 2, taking the 3rd place in the ACE test and 9th in the Autobild test. The tyre performed considerably well in aspects covering dry handling, exterior noise, wet braking, wet circle cornering, and wet handling. Furthermore, it displayed solid resistance to aquaplaning, offered compelling comfort, rolled efficiently, and had a remarkable value for price. Like the Sava Intensa UHP 2, the tyre lifespan for the Fulda SportControl 2 was found moderate.
Summarizing all the test results, it can be concluded that both tyres performed decently, each with its own unique strengths. In overall performance, however, the
Fulda SportControl 2 stood out just a tad more than the
Sava Intensa UHP 2. Nonetheless, both tyres are excellent choices in their own right, each offering performance and value. Decision between the two will likely depend on individual preferences & needs like noise tolerance, handling requirements, and choice between price and lifespan.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Fulda SportControl 2 11.072. Sava Intensa UHP 2 12.86
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Rolling resistance
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35.9 | 34.4 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 36.2 | 33.9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 61.7 | 27.4 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 63.9 | 29 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 36,3 | 29,8 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 36,5 | 29,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 61 | 56 | 20 | 8 | 18 | ||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Recommended | 56 | 47 | 17 | 8 | 18 | ||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Recommended | 61 | 47 | 17 | 8 | 12 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 34,7 | 35,5 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 34,2 | 31,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 35,1 | 32 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,3 | 38,3 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 35,1 | 37,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
