Segment
2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Sava (61%). The first tyre test of Sava Intensa UHP 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Sava Intensa UHP 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (54%) of the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 13.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
