Segment
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Premium2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost3. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Eskimo S3+ vs. Michelin Alpin A4 vs. Barum Polaris 3
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Barum Polaris 3 10.63. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.2
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary2. Michelin Alpin A4 Highly recommended3. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Recommended2. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory3. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2,8 | 3,6 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
| Michelin Alpin A4 Rating: Recommended | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 2,7 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo S3+ | 43,0 | 28,7 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin A4 | 39,7 | 27,9 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 40,8 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
