Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost3. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Satisfactory3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Satisfactory3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 39.5 | 29.6 | |||||
| Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
| Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 | 37.7 | 32.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,0 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 3,4 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37,6 | 26,1 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
