12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Sava Eskimo HP2 /58%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Dunlop Winter Sport 5 /86%	Kleber KRISALP HP3 /77%

Dimensions	R15 - R18	R14 - R19	R14 - R21	R14 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 189

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 113

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 25

Number of tests

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 48x

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 28x

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 15x

Best position in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 1.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2.

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 6.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 16.

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 16.

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 23.

Average position in tests

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 4.9

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 8.04

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 2025

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2025

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 2025

Best rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

Dry

(Overall rating)

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

75%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

70%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

68%

Dry braking

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 76%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 74%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 63%

Dry handling

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 74%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 72%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 66%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

89%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

85%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

84%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

79%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 94%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 94%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 89%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 89%

Snow traction

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 82%

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 79%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 89%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 81%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 72%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 78%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 77%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 74%

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

81%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

79%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

62%

Wet braking

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 72%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 61%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 84%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 78%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 73%

Wet handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 81%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 76%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 60%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 87%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 76%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 57%

Wet circle cornering

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 75%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 59%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo HP2

83%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

73%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

68%

Mileage

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 74%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 70%

4. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 64%

Rolling resistance

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 83%

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 83%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 69%

Price/value

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 92%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

4. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 57%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 C

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

83%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

77%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

76%

Exterior noise

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 71%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 69%

Comfort

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 83%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 83%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 80%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 72 dB

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 ?

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo HP2

85.2%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

77.7%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

76.5%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 8 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Snow
Best values in test	32.6	27.1
Sava Eskimo HP2	37.9	28.1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	36.0	27.3
Kleber Krisalp HP3	36.2	27.1
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Sava Eskimo HP2	39.5	29.6
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	37.5	29.4
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	37.4	29.2
Kleber Krisalp HP3	37.8	29.3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Sava Eskimo HP2	37,6	26,1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	35,3	26,5
Kleber KRISALP HP3	37,3	25,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3	2-	2	2	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	3+	2
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good	2+	2-	2+	2	3+
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Exemplary	2-	2	2+	3+	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,5	28
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,6	27,9
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	33,6	27,3
Kleber KRISALP HP3	35,6	28,4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3	1-	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	2-
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	2+	3+	1-	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2	2-
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Good	2	2-	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,4	27,2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	33,6	27,6
Kleber KRISALP HP3	35,7	26,7
Show test details

Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands