Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost3. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost4. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| # | Sava Eskimo HP2
| Barum Polaris 5
| Debica Frigo HP2
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R13 - R19 | R15 - R18 | R0 - R21 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Barum Polaris 5 15.153. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.474. Debica Frigo HP2 17.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good2. Barum Polaris 5 Good3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended3. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
6
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 39.5 | 29.6 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37.7 | 30.0 | |||||
| Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37,6 | 26,1 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37,5 | 26,9 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2+ | ||
| Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,5 | 28 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 36,1 | 28,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,3 | 25,1 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,2 | 24,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 33,6 | 24,1 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 33,9 | 25 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 34,2 | 24,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
