Segment
1. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Lowcost2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 vs. Debica Presto UHP 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Sailun) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Generally, Sailun summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Debica (58%). In this particular case, the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 has a better rating of 66% compared to 56% of the Debica Presto UHP 2. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Atrezzo ZSR 2 and the Presto UHP 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2
| Debica Presto UHP 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R17 | R17 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 | 34.3 | 28.7 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP 2 | 36.4 | 33.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,7 | |||||
| Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 3,1 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
