Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle4. Riken Road Performance Lowcost
Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005
Our comprehensive tyre comparisons are bound to provide drivers with the required information to make the best choices. This time, we're comparing two tyres: Riken Road Performance and Kleber Dynaxer HP4.
Riken Road Performance does not possess a previous or newer model. In tests such as the ADAC and Autobild, it did not fare very well. It secured 48th place out of 50 in ADAC and 46th out of 53 in Autobild. Key weaknesses highlighted are significant weaknesses on dry road conditions and concerning weaknesses on wet road conditions leading to downgrading. Sustainability and longevity were also mentioned as demerits. The noticeable advantages of these tyres include their light weight and low tread wear.
Moving on to the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 manufactured by Kleber, the model is rated at a decent 74%, and specializes as a summer tyre. Within the ADAC test, it significantly outperformed the Riken Road Performance by coming 12th out of 50. In the Autobild test, the HP4 achieved 14th place out of 53 tyres tested, with special mention of comfort and exterior noise being its best features.
In terms of performance, general strengths are good environmental balance, tread life, and efficiency. The summary of tests emphasized good aquaplaning properties, short brake distances on wet and dry surfaces, and a comfortable and quiet ride. However, it shared similar weaknesses with the Riken Road Performance, namely, slightly unbalanced performance, weaknesses on wet road conditions causing a downgrade, and mediocre grip in wet conditions causing delayed steering response and understeering behavior on dry track.
In conclusion, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 appears to be the superior tyre in overall test comparisons, despite sharing some weaknesses with the Riken Road Performance. It exhibits surprisingly good properties in various categories, aligning with the manufacturer's reputation for quality. However, the Riken Road Performance may still be suitable for drivers prioritizing lightweight and less waste in tyre wear, but its performance on wet and dry roads could be a major concern for many.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | ||||||
| Riken Road Performance Rating: Poor | 3,1 | ||||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 2,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 29,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,8 | 27,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Riken Road Performance | 37,8 | 39,7 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,4 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
