Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle4. Riken Road Performance Lowcost5. Avon ZV7 Lowcost
Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. Avon ZV7 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005
Number of sizes available
2. Avon ZV7 278
Number of tests
Best position in test
4. Avon ZV7 8.
Worst position in test
4. Avon ZV7 42.
Average position in tests
3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.584. Avon ZV7 18.55
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended4. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended4. Avon ZV7 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | ||||||
| Riken Road Performance Rating: Poor | 3,1 | ||||||
| Avon ZV7 Rating: Sufficient | 4,1 | 3,9 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 2,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Riken Road Performance | 37,8 | 39,7 | |||||
| Avon ZV7 | 37,9 | 34,3 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,4 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
