Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle3. Riken Road Performance Lowcost4. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost
Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.583. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | ||||||
| Riken Road Performance Rating: Poor | 3,1 | ||||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Good | 3,5 | 3,0 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Riken Road Performance | 37,8 | 39,7 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 36,8 | 33,2 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
