Segment
1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Premium2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Premium3. Michelin Alpin A4 Premium4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle5. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 vs. Michelin Alpin A4 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
4. Barum Polaris 3 10.6
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Exemplary3. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Highly recommended4. Michelin Alpin A4 Highly recommended5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Recommended2. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory3. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Still recommended4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended5. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Sufficient
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 1- | 2 | 3+ | 3 | |||
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 1- | 2+ | |||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 | 32,2 | 29,8 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 35,8 | 27,6 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 36,3 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
