Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium2. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium3. Cooper Zeon CS8 Upper-middle4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle5. Nordexx NS9000 Lowcost6. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost
Comparison: Nordexx NS9000 vs. Maxxis Premitra HP5 vs. Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.673. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.255. Cooper Zeon CS8 19.716. Nordexx NS9000 46.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Test winner3. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Very good4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good5. Cooper Zeon CS8 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good3. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Conditionally recommended4. Cooper Zeon CS8 Sufficient5. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Nordexx NS9000 | 38,8 | 36,1 | |||||
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 | 36,2 | 28,4 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 38,9 | 33,0 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Vredestein ULTRAC | 36,1 | 26,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Nordexx NS9000 | 37,9 | 43,6 | |||||
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 | 35,4 | 40,5 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 37 | 39,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
