Segment
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle4. Nordexx NS9000 Lowcost
Comparison: Nordexx NS9000 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Michelin Primacy 4+
Table of contents:
| # | Nordexx NS9000
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Vredestein ULTRAC
| Michelin Primacy 4+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R19 | R14 - R20 | R15 - R21 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.673. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.254. Nordexx NS9000 46.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Highly recommended3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good3. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Nordexx NS9000 | 38,8 | 36,1 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Vredestein ULTRAC | 36,1 | 26,6 | |||||
| Michelin Primacy 4+ | 36,3 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
