Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium2. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium4. Cooper Zeon CS8 Upper-middle5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle6. Nordexx NS9000 Lowcost
Comparison: Nordexx NS9000 vs. Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.674. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.255. Cooper Zeon CS8 19.716. Nordexx NS9000 46.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary2. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended3. Continental PremiumContact 7 Test winner4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good5. Cooper Zeon CS8 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended4. Cooper Zeon CS8 Sufficient5. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Nordexx NS9000 | 38,8 | 36,1 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 38,9 | 33,0 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Vredestein ULTRAC | 36,1 | 26,6 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | 35,9 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Nordexx NS9000 | 37,9 | 43,6 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 37 | 39,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
