Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Premium2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
# | Nokian zLine
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R17 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Summer season brings the need for a careful consideration of the most suitable tyre. We take a look at two summer tyres; Nokian zLine and Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 and compare their performance based on the available test data. Both tyres have proven their worth on the market with no previous models or replacements. A direct link to Nokian's website and a link to Hankook’s, are available to further explore their vast choice range.
The Nokian zLine excelled in dry handling as noted in the ACE test where it secured a Bronze medal. However, in the Sportsauto and Autobild tests, it finished in the middle of the pack in 5th and 7th positions respectively out of 7 and 9 tested tyres. ADAC test also saw it secure a 7th position out of 16 tyres. The GTÜ test, on the other hand, showed its performance dwindling a bit as the tyre secured the 6th position out of 14.
The Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117, on the other hand, stands out in dry driving behavior, exterior noise, and wet braking as seen in the ACE test where it secured the 4th position. Out of 9 tyres in the Autobild test, it managed a fair 5th position. More impressive was its performance in the ADAC test where it secured 5th position out of 16 and in the Sportsauto test it landed a Bronze medal ahead of Nokian zLine. Nonetheless, the GTÜ test results were a bit underwhelming with it securing 9th position out of 14 tyres total.
In summary, the Hankook S1 Evo 2 K117 is seen to retain a consistent performance across the tests with impressive wet braking properties and a low exterior noise. The Nokian zLine also comes in as a reliable choice particularly with dry handling. However, its lower positions in the test results when compared to Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 make it a lesser optimal choice. Evidently, the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 stands out as a solid choice based on its consistently higher test results.
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Premium2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
2. Nokian zLine 20.
2. Nokian zLine 7.38
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Exemplary2. Nokian zLine Recommended
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Recommended
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 150 | 55 | 39 | 14 | 7 | ||
Nokian zLine Rating: Recommended | 149 | 63 | 47 | 18 | 7 | ||
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Recommended | 146 | 65 | 46 | 15 | 9 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
Nokian zLine Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 1,9 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 278 | 146 | 143 | 25 | 10 | ||
Nokian zLine | 240 | 119 | 121 | 22 | 9 | ||
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 | 225 | 102 | 123 | 17 | 10 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 9,3 | 6 | 7,6 | 7 | |||
Nokian zLine Rating: Recommended | 8,2 | 8,4 | 8 | 8,4 | |||
Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Recommended | 8,8 | 8,9 | 8,8 | 7,9 | |||
Show test details |