Segment
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV Premium2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop). Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Dunlop winter tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR SUV 3 and Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the WR SUV 3 and the Winter Sport 5 SUV were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 53% of Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV has B rating.
| # | Nokian WR SUV 3
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R16 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV Premium2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV Highly recommended
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 406 | 147 | 134 | 143 | |||
| Nokian WR SUV 3 Rating: Highly recommended | 390 | 131 | 128 | 131 | |||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV Rating: Highly recommended | 389 | 147 | 127 | 115 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Nokian WR SUV 3 Rating: - | 2 | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||