18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Uniroyal WinterExpert vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Nokian WR Snowproof /41%	Kleber KRISALP HP3 /77%	Barum Polaris 5 /63%	Uniroyal WinterExpert /79%	Fulda Kristall Control HP2 /64%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensions	R14 - R20	R14 - R20	R13 - R19	R13 - R20	R15 - R19	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle

3. Uniroyal WinterExpert Upper-middle

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

5. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost

6. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 113

2. Uniroyal WinterExpert 91

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

4. Barum Polaris 5 76

5. Nokian WR Snowproof 60

6. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 50

Number of tests

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 28x

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 25x

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

4. Nokian WR Snowproof 14x

5. Barum Polaris 5 13x

6. Uniroyal WinterExpert 12x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2.

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2.

4. Uniroyal WinterExpert 5.

5. Nokian WR Snowproof 5.

6. Barum Polaris 5 9.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 16.

3. Uniroyal WinterExpert 19.

4. Nokian WR Snowproof 20.

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 23.

6. Barum Polaris 5 26.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 8.04

3. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07

4. Uniroyal WinterExpert 11.25

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 12.36

6. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2025

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2025

4. Uniroyal WinterExpert 2025

5. Barum Polaris 5 2023

6. Nokian WR Snowproof 2023

Best rating in test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

4. Barum Polaris 5 Good

5. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory

6. Uniroyal WinterExpert Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory

4. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory

5. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient

6. Uniroyal WinterExpert Sufficient

Dry

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof

83%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

75%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

68%

Uniroyal
WinterExpert

65.3%

Barum
Polaris 5

63%

Dry braking

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 83%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 76%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 66%

5. Barum Polaris 5 55%

6. Uniroyal WinterExpert 0%

Dry handling

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 84%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 74%

3. Barum Polaris 5 71%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 70%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

6. Uniroyal WinterExpert 0%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

89%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

84%

Barum
Polaris 5

75%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

74%

Nokian
WR Snowproof

70%

Uniroyal
WinterExpert

68.1%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 94%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 89%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 89%

4. Barum Polaris 5 81%

5. Nokian WR Snowproof 82%

6. Uniroyal WinterExpert 0%

Snow traction

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 79%

4. Barum Polaris 5 71%

5. Nokian WR Snowproof 70%

6. Uniroyal WinterExpert 0%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 89%

3. Barum Polaris 5 81%

4. Nokian WR Snowproof 69%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 57%

6. Uniroyal WinterExpert 0%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 77%

3. Barum Polaris 5 67%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 61%

5. Nokian WR Snowproof 62%

6. Uniroyal WinterExpert 0%

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

79%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

69%

Nokian
WR Snowproof

63%

Barum
Polaris 5

61%

Uniroyal
WinterExpert

58%

Wet braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 72%

3. Nokian WR Snowproof 64%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 61%

5. Barum Polaris 5 55%

6. Uniroyal WinterExpert 0%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 91%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 84%

4. Nokian WR Snowproof 67%

5. Barum Polaris 5 56%

6. Uniroyal WinterExpert 0%

Wet handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 76%

3. Barum Polaris 5 73%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 63%

5. Nokian WR Snowproof 62%

6. Uniroyal WinterExpert 0%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 87%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 74%

4. Nokian WR Snowproof 57%

5. Barum Polaris 5 46%

6. Uniroyal WinterExpert 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 75%

3. Barum Polaris 5 73%

4. Nokian WR Snowproof 65%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 59%

6. Uniroyal WinterExpert 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Nokian WR Snowproof B

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 B

4. Barum Polaris 5 C

5. Uniroyal WinterExpert C

6. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 5

87%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

83%

Nokian
WR Snowproof

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

73%

Uniroyal
WinterExpert

72.4%

Rolling resistance

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 94%

2. Barum Polaris 5 91%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 83%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

5. Kleber KRISALP HP3 69%

6. Uniroyal WinterExpert 0%

Mileage

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 82%

2. Barum Polaris 5 79%

3. Nokian WR Snowproof 76%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

5. Kleber KRISALP HP3 70%

6. Uniroyal WinterExpert 0%

Price/value

1. Barum Polaris 5 92%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 84%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 80%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

5. Nokian WR Snowproof 69%

6. Uniroyal WinterExpert 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 C

2. Nokian WR Snowproof C

3. Uniroyal WinterExpert C

4. Barum Polaris 5 E

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

6. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

83%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

83%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Nokian
WR Snowproof

81%

Uniroyal
WinterExpert

73.4%

Barum
Polaris 5

65%

Exterior noise

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

3. Nokian WR Snowproof 84%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 74%

5. Barum Polaris 5 69%

6. Uniroyal WinterExpert 0%

Comfort

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 93%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

4. Nokian WR Snowproof 78%

5. Barum Polaris 5 61%

6. Uniroyal WinterExpert 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 72 dB

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

4. Nokian WR Snowproof ?

5. Barum Polaris 5 ?

6. Uniroyal WinterExpert ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Nokian
WR Snowproof

79.9%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

77.7%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

71.4%

Uniroyal
WinterExpert

32%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 215/60 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	2,0	1,8	1,4	1,8	1,5	2,7	1,5
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory	3,2	2,7	2,4	2,3	2,0	2,7	2,0
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	2,8	2,9	1,8	2,2	1,8	2,8	2,5
Uniroyal WinterExpert Rating: Satisfactory	2,8	3,3	1,7	1,8	1,5	2,9	2,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory	3	2	2-	1-	2+
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Exemplary	2-	2	2+	3+	2
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2+	1-	2+
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2-	2	1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	3+	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Nokian WR Snowproof	36,5	29,2
Kleber KRISALP HP3	35,6	28,4
Barum Polaris 5	36,1	28,8
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,8	28,6
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,6	27,9
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2020 235/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,5	1,9	1,8	2,3	2,6	0,8	1,8
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory	2,9	2,5	2,5	2,7	2,7	2,0	2,1
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	2,4	3,0	2,0	2,4	2,9	2,5	2,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Good	2-	2-	2+	2-
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	2+	3+	1-	2-
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2+	2-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Nokian WR Snowproof	32,2	24,6
Kleber KRISALP HP3	32,2	24
Barum Polaris 5	33,9	25
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	33,5	24,3
Show test details

Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Uniroyal WinterExpert vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands