Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Kleber KRISALP HP3 has a better rating of 77% compared to 41% of the Nokian WR Snowproof. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the Kleber KRISALP HP3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the WR Snowproof and the KRISALP HP3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where WR Snowproof is made - Finland/Russian Federation.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Performance comparison
Averaged from 3 tests
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
