In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian WR D4 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Kleber KRISALP HP3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the WR D4 and the KRISALP HP3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where WR D4 is made - Finland.
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Averaged from 4 tests
Nokian WR D4
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR D4
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR D4
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR D4
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR D4
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR D4
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR D4
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.