Segment
1. Michelin Alpin A4 Premium2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium3. Nokian WR D3 Upper-middle4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle5. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WR D3 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Michelin Alpin A4 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
5. Nokian WR D3 10.
Worst position in test
3. Nokian WR D3 17.
Average position in tests
3. Barum Polaris 3 10.64. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.215. Nokian WR D3 13.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary2. Michelin Alpin A4 Highly recommended4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Michelin Alpin A4 Recommended3. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Nokian WR D3 | 42,7 | 28,2 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 40,8 | 28,6 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin A4 | 39,7 | 27,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 43,4 | 28,1 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 41,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Nokian WR D3 Rating: - | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Exemplary | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Michelin Alpin A4 Rating: - | 2 | 2- | 1 | 1- | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: - | 2- | 3+ | 1- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
