Segment
1. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Premium2. Michelin Alpin A4 Premium3. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Premium4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium5. Nokian WR D3 Upper-middle6. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WR D3 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 vs. Michelin Alpin A4 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
6. Nokian WR D3 10.
Worst position in test
5. Nokian WR D3 17.
Average position in tests
5. Barum Polaris 3 10.66. Nokian WR D3 13.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary2. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Highly recommended3. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Highly recommended4. Michelin Alpin A4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
3. Michelin Alpin A4 Recommended4. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory5. Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Nokian WR D3 | 42,7 | 28,2 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 40,8 | 28,6 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 | 36,8 | 28,3 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin A4 | 39,7 | 27,9 | |||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip 9 | 36,9 | 28,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 43,4 | 28,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Nokian WR D3 Rating: - | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Exemplary | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Dunlop SP Winter Response 2 Rating: - | 1 | 2 | 1- | 3+ | |||
| Michelin Alpin A4 Rating: - | 2 | 2- | 1 | 1- | |||
| Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: - | 1 | 2- | 2+ | 2 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
