Segment
2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WetProof vs. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Nokian (61%). The first tyre test of Nokian WetProof was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WetProof dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (54%) of the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WetProof is made in Finland and ContiPremiumContact 5 is made in Czech Republic.
| # | Nokian WetProof
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WetProof 5.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary2. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WetProof Recommended
