Segment
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Nokian Snowproof 2 has a better rating of 69% compared to 55% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52. The first tyre test of Nokian Snowproof 2 was done in 2023, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Snowproof 2 and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Snowproof 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (94%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Nokian Snowproof 2
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R0 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 Recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 Recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Nokian Snowproof 2 | 40.0 | 30.5 | |||||
| Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||