Segment
1. Nokian Seasonproof 2 Upper-middle2. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Seasonproof 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Nokian allround tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Yokohama (26%). In this particular case, the Nokian Seasonproof 2 has a better rating of 90% compared to 26% of the Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21. The first tyre test of Nokian Seasonproof 2 was done in 2025, compared to 2019 when was the Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 81% of Nokian Seasonproof 2 has A wet grip rating, whereas 90% of Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 has B rating.
| # | Nokian Seasonproof 2
| Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Seasonproof 2 Test winner2. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Satisfactory
